Smart tech we’ve been hearing about for several years. Readers of this blog already heard about DARPAbit (“Biology IS Technology”), so bio is no surprise here. PEOPLE-CENTRIC = people centric experiences citizen developer citizen experience corporate social responsibility digital workplace virtual care SMART = smart advisors smart cities smart dust (missing from this year’s list) smart government smart grid smart machines smart robots connected home wearable devices in smart government The three main categories she mentioned as leading clusters are Bio, Smart, and People-Centric.īIO = biotech biochips bioprinting human augmentation
GARTNER HYPE CYCLE 2015 BIG DATA FULL
True, but does that mean that they are leapfrogging from the trough of disillusionment directly into full production for primetime consumption within a year? That seems unlikely. She mentioned that the technologies are changing VERY rapidly. Does it work? Does it work well? Are people using it? Is it ready? These are considered distinct and separate concepts from reporting about the “hype,” the industry conversations and reporting around any specific tech. It isn’t just about the hype anymore, but each report includes information on the specific technologies, their benefits, their maturity, and how well adapted they are to their market. They’ve expanded the way the hype cycle reports give information. It’s really an expression of what we’re hearing as industry noise.” Betsy Burton on the 2015 Gartner Hype Cycles. “But it’s really important that people DON’T consider a position on the Hype Cycle - in other words, moving towards the peak, or even moving towards the trough - as an indication of maturity. But you have to dig deeper to understand. Is it no longer relevant to the hype cycle? Far from it. It’s gone as a dot on the main curve also. Hype Cycles 2015: “VP Distinguished Analyst Betsy Burton talks about this year’s Hype Cycle Special Report.” īetsy Burton explains that Big Data is gone as a hype cycle report because the concept is in so many places they decided to fold it in to each of those other reports. There is a video on the main Hype Cycle page that hints at a bit of the why. A lot of very interesting topics are now missing from the report, but are still not quite ready for prime time. Things that were in the trough last year and should have theoretically been climbing out this year (like “mobile health monitoring” and “near field communication”) are also gone. Are they considered mature now? I’m not sure. Concepts like “speech recognition” and “consumer telematics” are gone. This one was immediately and visibly different from others.ĭo you see what I see? The long tail on the right (“Slope of Enlightenment” and “Plateau of Productivity”) for 2015 is FAR more sparse and empty than the others. I’ve been tracking the Hype Cycle as long as I’ve been working in emerging tech. Gartner’s 2015 Hype Cycle for Emerging Technologies Identifies the Computing Innovations That Organizations Should Monitor: 2015 Hype Cycle Special Report Illustrates the Market Excitement, Maturity and Benefit of More Than 2,000 Technologies Its research is produced independently by its research organization without input or influence from any third party.įor further information, see Guiding Principles on Independence and Objectivity.The newest Gartner Emerging Technologies Hype Cycle came out two days ago. Gartner prides itself on its reputation for independence and objectivity. Your access and use of this publication are governed by Gartner’s Usage Policy.
While the information contained in this publication has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, Gartner disclaims all warranties as to the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of such information.Īlthough Gartner research may address legal and financial issues, Gartner does not provide legal or investment advice and its research should not be construed or used as such. It consists of the opinions of Gartner’s research organization, which should not be construed as statements of fact.
This publication may not be reproduced or distributed in any form without Gartner’s prior written permission. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc.
0 kommentar(er)
